NPAMC Blog

Sunday, February 15, 2009

Judges Order Massive Prisoner Release

When I was a prosecutor I didn’t worry about jail or prison overcrowding. I used to say that my job was to fill the jails, not empty them. I also didn’t believe in treatment programs. I was convinced that they didn’t work and were a poor alternative to jail or prison.

However, in 2003, the good folks at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, National Association of Prosecutor Coordinators, and National Association of Drug Court Professionals introduced me to a program for DWI offenders that works far better and costs far less: DWI Courts. I spent hundreds of hours researching the program and learned I was wrong. Studies have shown that properly run programs can dramatically reduce DWI recidivism and improve highway safety. Of course, it’s not all about DWI offenders. Research demonstrates that offenders who commit other crimes and have alcohol, drug or mental health misuse issues also can benefit from treatment and monitoring programs like drug court.

These programs are becoming increasingly important for another reason. Our nation’s jails and prisons are filling rapidly, courtesy of habitual-offender laws and “technical” violators. We simply cannot afford to build more correctional facilities, especially in this economy. We are reaching a tipping point and must take appropriate action.

Unfortunately, we’re running out of time; California has already crossed the line. Last week, Federal judges ordered the state to release up to 57,000 prisoners. To put this in perspective, there were only 506 incorporated municipalities with populations above 57,000 people at the time of the 2000 (http://www.demographia.com/db-2000city50kr.htm).
The judges opined that the release can be accomplished without jeopardizing public safety (http://www.reuters.com/article/wtMostRead/idUSTRE5190CB20090210). Those of us who remember prior mass releases know better!

If you think this can’t happen in your state, you’re probably wrong.

We need to stop sending people who commit lesser crimes to jail and prison for significant periods of time when more effective programs exist. We must create jail and prison space for the people who really need to be warehoused for the public’s good. And we must do so NOW. As the judges’ order demonstrates, if we don’t take control of the problem soon, it’s going to take control of us.

What do YOU say?

Stephen K. Talpins
Chief Executive Officer
National Partnership on Alcohol Misuse and Crime


Comments

As the Director of the National Center for DWI Courts, this is absolutely correct.  I too was a prosecutor for over 20 years, and I prosecuted drunk drivers and made sure they went to jail.  And then they would be back again, and it would all start over.  They didn’t learn their lesson.  Jail by itself doesn’t work with these individuals.  They need long term treatment along with intensive supervision to ensure they no longer drink.  DWI Courts use sanctions and incentives to change the offender’s behavior.  Jail is used, but it is used more strategically along with incentives. 

Recent studies demonstrate that these courts are more effective, and cost less than traditional courts.  It is this intensive program that can make a difference with repeat offenders, so they will become law abiding, productive members of society.

Posted by (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  03/18  at  08:57 PM

I work for a private criminal justice/social services agency that is a primary provider of SCRAM, as well as RF and GPS for EMP/home detention services.

I don’t want to be seen as self-serving, but I am quite frustrated with the handling of DWI cases in two local county judicial systems in my agency’s service area. Many defense attorneys that I’ve spoken to have corroborated this feeling.

Both county’s are quite punitive with DWI offenders—having previously passed up opportunities to start DWI Hybrid Courts—and yet both have very active Drug Courts. Seems to me that there is some inherent attitudinal resistance (esp. from the DA’s and Probation Depts.) to treating DWI offenders with even a faint semblance to a Drug Court-like philosophy.

Now with the county-municipal budget crisis, the standard complaint is “no money” to start anything new, while the system continues to send treatable DWI offenders off to jail (wherein no treatment opportunity exists).

Any advice on how to impact this mind-set?

Posted by (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  08/03  at  04:45 PM

Lee, either David Wallace, Director of the National Center for DWI Courts (NCDC; a division of the National Association of Drug Court Professionals) and an NPAMC Board Member, and I both are available to speak with local officials.  We can provide them technical assistance and inform them about grant opportunities.

In fact, your timing couldn’t be better.  NCDC and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) are taking applications for the DWI Court Training Initiative for CY2010.  This means that local officials can obtain funding for training.  The deadline (if officialas want travel covered) is August 28, 2009.  The DWI Court Training Initiative is supported by the NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, in collaboration with the NCDC.

You may contact NCDC via their website at:  http://www.nadcp.org/contact.

Feel free to contact me if you have any further questions, comments or concerns at 305-610-3585.

Thank you and good luck.

Stephen K. Talpins
Chief Executive Officer
National Partnership on Alcohol Misuse and Crime

Posted by (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  08/05  at  11:50 PM

That sounds Good..keep it up!

Feel free to visit us:

California Injury Lawyer

Injury Lawyer

California Attorney

Personal Injury Lawyer

Personal Injury Claim

Posted by (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  11/03  at  07:48 PM

Name:
Post Anonymously?

Email:

Post a Comment

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments

Submit the word you see below: